Subscribe to Our Blog

With RSS feeds, you don't have to visit our site everyday to keep up to date. Simply subscribe to our blog via RSS or Email and our posts will come to you!

Legalized Marijuana in the Workplace: What Do Employers Need to Know?

07.06.2023 Written by: Henningson & Snoxell, Ltd.

Legalized Marijuana in the Workplace: What Do Employers Need to Know?

Minnesota has become the 23rd State to legalize recreational marijuana, which goes into effect on August 1, 2023. With this change, employers have a few important steps to take to ensure safety in the workplace for their employees and their business. Here is what employers should know:

  • Recreational marijuana is still illegal until August 1, 2023; therefore, any use or possession can still be subject to disciplinary action.
  • After August 1, employers have some restrictions for prohibiting the use or possession of cannabis at work and when they can test for cannabis.

Prohibition on Use or Possession at Work

An employer cannot regulate an employee’s use and possession of recreational marijuana off work premises and during nonworking hours.

Employers can, however, regulate an employee’s use and possession during working hours, on work premises, or while operating an employer’s vehicle, machinery, or equipment.

Additionally, employers have no duty to permit or accommodate the use, possession, impairment, sale, or transfer of cannabis product (etc.) while an employee is working, on work premises, or operating an employer’s vehicle, machinery, or equipment.

Disciplinary Action Allowed

Employers may discipline, discharge, or take other adverse action against an employee for such use if:

  • As a result of consumption, the employee does not possess the clearness of intellect and control of self that the employee otherwise would have;
  • Cannabis testing verifies the presence of cannabis product (etc.) following a confirmatory test;
  • As provided in the employer’s written work rules for cannabis products (etc.), provided the rules are in writing and in a written policy containing the minimum information; or
  • As otherwise authorized or required under state or federal law, or if failure to do so would cause an employer to lose a monetary or licensing-related benefit under federal law or regulations.

Employers may not discipline, discharge, discriminate against, or request rehabilitation of an employee:

  • Based on a positive result that has not been verified by a confirmatory test.
  • Based on a positive result from a confirmatory cannabis test unless:
    • Employer has first given the employee an opportunity to participate in a counseling or rehabilitation program; and
    • The employee either refused to participate or has failed to successfully complete the program (via withdrawal from program before completion or by positive confirmatory test after completion of program).

Employers may temporarily suspend or transfer an employee to another position (at the same rate of pay) pending the outcome of the confirmatory test, as long as the employer believes it is to be reasonably necessary to protect the health or safety of the employee, co-employees, or the public.

Cannabis Testing for Employees

An employer can test for cannabis when:

  • The employee works in a “safety-sensitive position.” Such positions are subject to Random Testing.
  • The employer has a reasonable suspicion that the employee:
  • Is under the influence of drugs or alcohol;
  • Has violated the employer’s written work rules prohibiting such use;
  • Sustained a personal injury or has caused another employee to sustain a personal injury; or
  • Caused a work-related accident or was operating or helping to operate machinery, equipment or vehicles involved in a work-related accident.
  • The employee has been referred by employer for substance use disorder treatment or evaluation.

An employer cannot test for cannabis on an arbitrary or capricious basis. In addition, employees have the right to request and receive a copy of the cannabis testing results from the employer.

What You Need to Do

  1. Update written drug and alcohol policies (usage and testing) to explicitly include cannabis language. This statute sets forth specific requirements for your written policy in order that it be compliant. Please contact our offices to ensure your policy reflects such language (some of which includes but is not limited to listing the employees or job applicants subject to testing under the policy, etc.)
  2. Prepare a form detailing the employer’s drug, alcohol, and cannabis testing policy and present it to the employees.

Please contact us before August 1, 2023, to update your drug and alcohol policies to include the necessary cannabis usage and testing language.

We will keep you informed as the Office of Cannabis Management continues to provide additional guidelines over the next year.

Read More


How the New Amendments Are Protecting Employees

06.23.2023 Written by: Business Law Department

On July 1, 2023, in addition to the new noncompete legislation, two new amendments will go into effect that will impact employees and businesses. The amendment to the wage disclosure protection will prohibit employers from retaliating against an employee for asserting rights or remedies, and there will be an increase in protection for nursing mothers and employees. Continue reading our blog as we navigate the two new amendments going into effect this year.

Amendment to the Wage Disclosure Protection

Effective July 1, 2023, the Wage Disclosure Protection will prohibit employers from discharging, disciplining, penalizing, interfering with, threatening, restraining, coercing, retaliating, or discriminating against an employee for asserting his or her rights or remedies under the Wage Disclosure Protection.

The Wage Disclosure Protection was enacted in 2014 and amended in 2022. The previous language merely prohibited an employer from retaliating against an employee for asserting rights or remedies under the Protection. The July 1, 2023, amendment clarifies the types of retaliation prohibited under the statute. Contact us regarding these clarifications and what employers need to know.

Increased Protections for Nursing Mothers and Pregnant Employees

Also, effective July 1, 2023, the Minnesota Legislature passed several amendments to the Nursing Mothers and Pregnant Employee laws.

  1. No more 12-month limitation. There is no longer a 12-month limitation for employers to provide reasonable break times each day for lactation. This means that employers must allow nursing mothers and lactating employees breaks each day beyond the 12-month period.
  2. Concurrent with other breaks. Previously, such breaks were required to be taken concurrently with other breaks. However, the new amendment now merely allows for concurrent breaks but does not require the lactation breaks to run concurrently.
  3. Elimination of “unduly disrupts operations.” Employers are no longer allowed to deny nursing mothers and lactating employees a break if the break would ‘unduly disrupt operations.’
  4. Increased protections for pregnancy accommodations without health care provider’s advisement. The new amendment provides increased protections without requiring a licensed health care provider or certified doula for (a) more frequent and longer break periods; (b) a temporary leave of absence; and (c) modification in work schedule or job assignments.
  5. Notice to Employees. Employers are required to inform employees of their rights under this law at the time of hire and when the employee makes an inquiry about or requests parental leave. Notice shall also be provided in the employee handbook, if available, stating the employee rights and remedies. The Department of Labor will make available a suggested text to be included in the notice for employers.

Please contact us to update your employee handbook and answer any questions regarding the new amendment.

Read More


No New Noncompetes

06.16.2023 Written by: Business Law Department

Warning to employers: A notable shift in employment law regarding the regulation of noncompete agreements has been passed by the Minnesota Legislature. Learn more about these changes and how they will affect your business moving forward.

No New Noncompetes: Effective July 1, 2023, any noncompete agreements agreed and entered into on or after July 1, 2023, will be considered void and unenforceable. This new law applies to non-profit organizations as well as for-profit businesses.

What Does it Mean?

  • The ban applies to all employees or independent contractors’ agreements, regardless of the person’s income, from working for another business after termination of employment, including:
    – for a specified period of time,
    – in a specified geographic area, or
    – for another employer in a capacity similar to the employee’s work for employer party to the agreement.
  • Noncompetes during employment are still valid.
  • The ban is not retroactive and will hold any noncompete provisions entered into before July 1, 2023, as valid and enforceable.
  • If the noncompete provision is rendered unenforceable, the remaining contract or agreement will still be valid and enforceable but without an enforceable noncompete provision.

What Can You Still Do?

  • Employers can still use noncompetes:
    – in the sale of a business, or
    – in anticipation of the dissolution of a business.
  • Employers can still use non-competes during the time of the employee’s employment.
  • Employees will still be subject to the following agreements:
    – Nondisclosure,
    – Confidentiality,
    – Trade secret, and
    – Non-solicitation.

Henningson & Snoxell Can Help

Please contact us with any questions or concerns regarding employee protections. We can utilize the tools mentioned above to protect your business and organizations.

In addition, please keep an eye out for more updates regarding the other new employment laws passed this session.

Read More


May is National Elder Law Month. Elder law attorneys are distinct from estate planning attorneys. While they may offer similar services, elder law attorneys bring additional knowledge to the table that benefits elderly and disabled individuals and their families. 

Elder law attorneys can provide many different types of services such as assisting in the setup of long-term care and Medicaid planning, Medicare appeals, long-term care contract reviews, special needs planning, and more. By working with families and providers in the elder law field daily, we develop connections and resources that help our clients navigate the challenging elder care system more effectively. 

Our elder law attorneys bring peace and predictability to families of aging loved ones or loved ones with disabilities.  We offer emergency services that meet the client and their family where they are and help them connect with resources to ensure their needs are met. Our services range from helping get conservatorships and guardianships to working with family members, care facilities, and the county to obtain assistance with paying for care costs. Our elder law attorneys provide a wide array of services that help take the stress off of families during some of the most challenging times. 

Henningson & Snoxell has elder law attorneys who are able to help you and your loved ones navigate this complex area. Call or email us today to get in contact with one of our knowledgeable elder law attorneys.

Read More


When a loved one starts to experience difficulty in taking care of himself or herself—whether due to disability or aging—there are often concerns about having the legal authority to act for the person who needs additional assistance in his or her support, finances, or otherwise. Anticipating these issues is the main feature of incapacity planning. If there has been no advanced planning in the case of incapacity, or even if the person named in the incapacity documents needs more legal authority to help effectively, there is a court process to assist people with greater needs by putting them under a guardianship or conservatorship. However, being under a guardianship or conservatorship does not mean a person has lost control over his or her own life. Continue reading our blog to learn more about the responsibilities of guardianships and conservatorships.

People subject to guardianship or conservatorship (sometimes called wards” or “protected persons,” respectively) are granted a list of rights under Minnesota law. These rights—including the rights to participate in their own healthcare decisions, to personal privacy, to have an attorney at any proceeding, and to generally still have control over their own lives—are guaranteed by the court. While the court ultimately enforces and protects these rights of the person subject to guardianship/conservatorship, as a practical matter, all stakeholders in the guardianship/conservatorship should know about the rights which they must respect.

Guardians or conservators of a person subject to a guardianship/conservatorship must additionally know about the duties associated with their role. Guardians have a duty to look after the person of the ward. They must provide for the person’s health and safety, ensuring that a person subject to guardianship has adequate food and shelter. Personal property is also under the purview of a guardian, requiring a guardian to take reasonable care of personal items, but even allowing the sale and removal of those items, as long as the person subject to guardianship is given notice and a chance to object. Being the overseer of personal well-being also carries with it the power to consent to or decline most medical care. Overall, the guardian must act in the best interest of the person. When guardians want help in determining the best interest of the person they are caring for, they can always seek the approval of the court for the chosen course of action.

Conservators have the responsibility to look after the protected person’s estate, or assets. Their responsibilities include paying for (and keeping detailed records of those expenses) the person’s support and financial maintenance. A conservator is tasked with paying the bills, writing checks, and maintaining financial accounts, all on behalf of the person subject to conservatorship and with that person’s assets. Necessarily, the court must oversee the conservator’s actions with an auditor’s eye view, requiring a yearly accounting of the assets, income, and expenses. Conservators use an online program to make these annual reports. The conservator needs to be comfortable with handling financial matters, including real estate. The conservator serves in the protected person’s best interest, but with regard to the kinds of needs, services, and purchases that need to be made for the benefit of the protected person. Where a person subject to guardianship has only income and no financial assets, the guardian collects income and pays the bills instead of having an appointed conservator.

The combination of respecting rights while fulfilling responsibilities can make for a difficult job. But guardians and conservators are often willing to go above and beyond for their loved ones who need their help. This does not mean that there is no conflict, or that the guardian or conservator will always get it right. The appointed guardian or conservator is often a spouse, child, sibling, or other close family relative. Indeed, the guardian and conservator can end up being the same person in many instances. Guardians and conservators straddle a line between deeply caring for the person subject to guardianship/conservatorship and having new legal responsibilities to help that person.

Guardianships and conservatorships add a new dimension to already complex familial relationships. Although the guardian or conservator may have been previously tapped for that role in an incapacity planning document, there are suddenly more responsibilities and accompanying duties. Even where the person subject to guardianship or conservatorship completely trusts and loves the person who is now guardian or conservator, the situation now requires interacting with that loved one in a court-monitored process that is regimented and particular.

Take, for example, a daughter who becomes the court-appointed guardian and conservator of her father. The daughter is an accountant, understanding all of her responsibilities with the capability to fulfill her role as conservator ably. When the daughter decides to approach her father about decluttering and organizing the house because she thinks it is unsafe as is, her father objects, claiming that he wants to keep all of his personal effects. The father is unhappy because he feels his desire to keep his house the way he wants is being questioned. The daughter is worried because she knows she has a legal duty to be proactive in protecting her father’s safety and well-being. She also needs to ensure that disposing of whatever property is sold is favorable to the estate.

The father has a right to be notified of his property being disposed of; the daughter must inform her father of her decision by mailing a written notice to her father listing the property that she intends to get rid of. The father may object within ten days of the postmark date and then demand court review of the daughter’s plans to remove his property. The objection must be officially served on the daughter. If her father objects, the court will have to calendar a hearing date to consider the daughter’s plan and whether it is in the best interest of her father. What started as a disagreement has become a legal quagmire.

The father understandably does not want to lose control over his life. The daughter loves her father dearly, but feels she is being more than reasonable in wanting to get rid of items she sees no value in and could create a safety issue for her father. There is a push-and-pull between the rights of the person subject to guardianship/conservatorship and the responsibilities of the guardian/conservator. Are these two headed to the courthouse all because of a difference in opinion about the father’s clutter? How much more difficult would it be if the daughter was not a financial professional with career experience and knowledge in these topics?

The possibility for these types of conflicts is real and anxiety-producing. Seeking representation from elder law attorneys can help you navigate, and even anticipate these scenarios in guardianships and conservatorships, potentially resolving disagreements before they get to the expense and publicity of a courtroom. Our attorneys can help you if you are under guardianship and/or conservatorship, advocating for your rights. We also set up guardianships and conservatorships for those seeking to take care of their family member or loved one, assisting proposed guardians or conservators in accepting their roles with the courts, and then advising the court-appointed guardians and conservators on how best to fulfill their obligations.

Come see an elder law attorney at Henningson & Snoxell to discuss your guardianship/conservatorship matter. Contact us to see how we can provide valuable representation that aims to achieve your best outcome.

Read More


FRONTLINE WORKER PAYMENTS: Immediate Impact on Employers

06.07.2022 Written by: Henningson & Snoxell, Ltd.

To thank those Minnesotans who worked on the frontlines during the COVID-19 peacetime emergency, Gov. Tim Walz signed Frontline Worker Payments into law April 29, 2022, enabling those workers to apply for Frontline Worker Pay. If you employed these workers, please pay close attention to the information below as it requires your immediate action.

Do your business or non-profit organizations fall under any of the following sectors?

  • Long-term care and home care
  • Health care
  • Emergency responders
  • Public health, social service, and regulatory service
  • Courts and corrections
  • Childcare
  • Schools, including charter schools, state schools, and higher education
  • Food service
  • Retail
  • Temporary shelters and hotels
  • Building services
  • Public transit
  • Ground and air transportation services
  • Manufacturing
  • Vocational rehabilitation

If so, you have a maximum of 15 days once the application period opens to provide notice in a form approved by the Commissioner of Minnesota’s Department of Labor and Industry. This application period opens on June 8th. The notice must tell all current workers who may be eligible for payments under this law about such payments and how to apply for them. A notice that meets this obligation has been posted at frontlinepay.mn.gov.

Note that this notice must be provided using the same means that you use to provide other work-related notices to employees. Additionally, the notice must be at least as conspicuous as posting a copy of the notice at each work site where workers work and where the notice may be readily observed and reviewed by all workers working at the site or providing a paper or electronic copy of the notice to all workers. In other words, it should either be visible to all workers or provided to each worker individually via email or paper copy,

If your employees have questions regarding the application process, direct them to frontlinepay.mn.gov.

If you are a current client of the firm, give us a call at 763-560-5700 if you have questions on any of the above information.

If you are new to the firm and have questions you would like us to address, please reach out to any of our business or nonprofit law attorneys.

Copyright © 2022 Henningson & Snoxell, Ltd. – All Rights Reserved.

Read More


Dementia & Guns: A Deadly Combination

01.12.2022 Written by: Henningson & Snoxell, Ltd.

There is a side to gun ownership that is not often discussed: what happens when a gun owner is no longer capable of safely owning or using his or her guns?

It is tragic when an individual with dementia ends up shooting a loved one.

Individuals who develop dementia frequently experience hallucinations or have times where they do not recognize the people around them.  This can be especially problematic if the individual has access to guns.  The individual may incorrectly believe someone they know is a stranger and that he or she needs to defend themselves.  It is tragic when such an individual ends up shooting a loved one.  In West Virginia, a grandfather with dementia thought he saw intruders entering his home, so he grabbed his Glock that he kept under his pillow and shot his wife and granddaughter.  The granddaughter was able to call for help, but the grandmother did not survive. 

Unfortunately, this can and does happen not only in other states but also right here in Minnesota. For families of loved ones with dementia, we commonly grapple with the question of when to take the car away.  Families should also discuss when the guns should be removed from the home or stored in a secure location for safety purposes.  This is a difficult conversation and the loved one may be in the denial stage of dementia.  In situations like this, families may need to involve the courts to initiate a proceeding to have the individual’s guns confiscated. 

Decide what to do with your firearms.

To prevent court intervention, families should engage in the conversations early on in an individual’s diagnosis so that the individual can be involved in deciding what to do with the firearms, to whom the firearms should go after they pass, or whether to voluntarily give them up.  For caretakers and family members, it is best to get this plan in writing and signed by the person when there is a voluntary relinquishment of the firearms.  This will be helpful in the future should the individual forget about the arrangement and make accusations that someone stole the guns.

Families may be forced to deal with this situation before they can bring caregivers or home health into the home.  Such agencies have policies that require that any firearms or weapons in the home be removed before their employees can come to the home.  By having a plan in place and removing the guns before there is a need for home health care or in-home assistance, families can avoid additional stress. 

If your family has a loved one who has been diagnosed with dementia, be sure to speak with physicians, elder law attorneys, or care coordinators to help you understand the ins and outs of what is to come. 

Our elder law concierge service at Henningson & Snoxell provides family with a personal touch to help navigate the chaos that comes with a loved one with a dementia diagnosis. Please reach out to see how we can help you and your family through this challenging time.


Rachell L. Henning

Rachell Henning is an Elder Law attorney that brings a wealth of personal and professional experience to her practice.  From an early age, Rachell has been dedicated to assisting elderly individuals and individuals with disabilities to live their lives to the fullest.

, , ,

Read More


Estate Planning For Snowbirds

12.03.2021 Written by: Henningson & Snoxell, Ltd.

               It’s that time of the year when Minnesotans head south for the winter to enjoy the warmer climate in states such as Florida, Arizona, and Texas.  If you are one of these lucky people, while you may not be establishing residency in these states, it is still essential to have a proper estate plan in place if something happens while you are on your extended vacation.

               If you have a Will, Trust, Power of Attorney, and/or Health Care Directive in place, reviewing those documents before heading south for the winter is a good idea to make sure your plans and wishes are current.  If you do not have an estate plan, getting something set up, even if it’s just incapacity documents, is better than having nothing expressing your decisions.

               It’s important to remember that even though you may be living in another state for months at a time, you would still be considered a Minnesota resident.  Therefore, your estate plan documents should reflect Minnesota law.  However, your estate plan should also consider assets and regulations in the state you are wintering in, as that state’s laws may dictate what would happen if you become incapacitated or deceased.

First step: Ensure Incapacity Documents

               First, you should ensure that your incapacity documents are up to date. Incapacity documents include Health Care Directives and Powers of Attorney. It’s essential to have a Health Care Directive that is general in nature, meaning it’s not applicable in only one state or with a specific wellness provider.  Often health care providers will equip patients with a Health Care Directive, and while that Health Care Directive is helpful, it may not be accepted by another provider. For example, if you are in Florida for the winter and become incapacitated, your primary provider’s Health Care Directive on file in Minnesota may not be recognized at the Florida hospital you are being helped at. A properly executed Health Care Directive should be applicable in states outside of Minnesota and with nearly any medical provider.

               Power of Attorney is another vital document to have in place.  Minnesota has a statutory power of attorney document that can be utilized anywhere in Minnesota (financial institutions, real estate transactions, etc.). However, if situations arise where the attorney-in-fact (your designated agent) attempts to deal with a financial institution, real estate company, or government agency in another state, in that situation, the Power of Attorney based in Minnesota may not be accepted since it is specific to Minnesota law. 

Therefore, it’s also crucial to have a Common Law Power of Attorney that is more general in nature. For instance, if you own real estate or have bank accounts in another state, the Common Law Power of Attorney should be effective in recognizing your attorney-in-fact to handle any transactions in that state where you are temporarily living. 

Next step: Ensure Will/Trust

               Lastly, you should always have a Will and/or Trust in place regardless of where you are residing.  These documents will ensure that your assets will be distributed per your desires upon death rather than be subject to that state’s laws.  You also want to make sure and nominate a Personal Representative/Executor who would be in charge of administering your estate.  Possessing a Trust could prevent the need for a conservatorship during your life and probate upon your passing.

Whether your assets would be subject to probate would depend on which state they were owned in and the value of those assets; a trust could prevent that regardless of the location and value.

               So while it may not be exciting to review or create your estate plan before leaving for the warmer climate, it is crucial to have documents in place so your loved ones can handle any issues that may arise due to any unforeseen event. Therefore, I would encourage you to ensure that everything is in place by contacting an attorney before heading south this winter.

Final step: Talk to an Estate Planning Attorney

Be sure to discuss with your attorney your Incapacity Documents along with your Will and Trust. Without having a Health Care Directive and/or Power of Attorney in place, your family could be left with a lengthy and costly court proceeding to get your affairs in order. These documents allow YOU to decide who you want to handle your medical and financial decisions, not the court.


Adam Kaufman is an attorney at the firm of Henningson & Snoxell, Ltd. located in Maple Grove, Minnesota. Adam helps individuals and families of all sizes and asset levels, by advising them and preparing: Wills Trusts Health care directives; and Powers of attorney.

,

Read More


What are Transfer on Death Deeds (TODDs)?

08.03.2021 Written by: Henningson & Snoxell, Ltd.

What are transfer on death deeds (TODDs)?

The adage, “if it’s too good to be true, it probably is” often applies to Transfer on Death Deeds (TODDs).

A TODD is a deed that beneficiary designates a property to someone upon the owner’s death.  To be valid, a TODD must be signed/dated/notarized and recorded with the county recorder prior to the owner’s death.  Because a TODD doesn’t convey title to the property until the owner dies, the owner continues to own the property and can sell, gift, mortgage, and otherwise “enjoy” all aspects of property ownership without involving the beneficiary.  Assuming the owner still owns the property at his or her death, the beneficiary clears the owner’s name from title using an Affidavit of Identity and Survivorship and a certified copy of the decedent’s death certificate.  

Because the process to clear title from the decedent’s name is simple, expedient, inexpensive, and avoids the need for a probate proceeding, TODDs are used as estate planning tools.

What can go wrong?

The most common problem with a TODD is that the owner beneficiary designates more than one person as the beneficiary.  If the owner has 4 children and names all 4 children as beneficiaries, title vests in the names of all 4 children at the owner’s death.  This means all 4 children co-own the property and must work together to pay bills relating to the property and make other decisions about the property (e.g. whether the property should be sold or rented).  When the time comes to convey title, all 4 children and their spouses must sign conveyancing documents.

If all 4 children are cooperative adults with sufficient assets to cover the expenses relating to the property until it can be liquidated or become income-producing, they can make this work, but if a child is a minor, is an incapacitated or uncooperative adult, is deceased at the owner’s death, is an adult on government benefits, or is an adult in the process of divorcing or bankruptcy, for example, it’s very difficult and expensive to deal with the property.

Another common issue with a TODD is that title and also the financial obligations secured by the property vest in the name of the beneficiary at the owner’s death.  Most beneficiaries are happy to inherit the equity in a property, but they don’t want to inherit (and perhaps can’t afford) the financial obligations tied to the property!

For these, and other, reasons, a TODD is a tool in the estate planner’s toolbox, but it is only used when is appropriate, and then, upon good counsel.  

If you are interested in a TODD, ask your Henningson & Snoxell, Ltd. estate planning attorney whether it is a good fit for your situation.


Susan T. Peterson-Lerdahl

Susan T. Peterson-Lerdahl is a shareholder in the Maple Grove, Minnesota Law Firm of Henningson & Snoxell, Ltd. She is Chair of the firm’s Estate Planning Department and has years of experience counseling individuals and families in estate planning, elder law, probate and trust administration as well as family business succession planning.

Read More